Artikel Ilmiah : E1A012009 a.n. MUHAMAD MUHYI ADAM
| NIM | E1A012009 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | MUHAMAD MUHYI ADAM |
| Judul Artikel | PEMBUKTIAN TINDAK PIDANA PERKOSAAN TERHADAP ANAK KANDUNG (INCEST) (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Nomor 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG.) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | ABSTRAK Semakin berkembangnya suatu masyarakat maka berkembang pula tindak pidana dalam suatu kelompok masyarakat tersebut. Tindak pidana dapat terjadi dimanapun, kapanpun dan terhadap siapapun termasuk perempuan dan anak- anak, misalnya saja kasus perkosaan terhadap anak kandung (incest). Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa bagaimana proses pembuktian tindak pidana perkosaan terhadap anak kandung (incest). Selain itu ditujukan pula untuk mengetahui kekuatan pembuktian keterangan saksi korban anak dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG. Berdasarkan atas hasil penelitian, bahwa Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Padang yang memeriksa, mengadili dan memutus perkara dalam Putusan Nomor 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG, sebelum menjatuhkan putusan pidana terhadap terdakwa MY, telah melaksanakan serangkaian proses pembuktian di persidangan. Dalam proses pemeriksaan pembuktian di persidangan Majelis Hakim telah melaksanakan ketentuan Pasal 183 dan Pasal 184 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan menerapkan teoriteori tentang syarat pemidanaan serta didasarkan pada pertimbangan yuridis. Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka Majelis Hakim menyatakan terdakwa MY terbukti secara sah dan menyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana Melakukan Kekerasan Atau Ancaman Kekerasan Memaksa Anak Melakukan Persetubuhan Dengannya berdasarkan rumusan Pasal 76D jo Pasal 81 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | ABSTRACT The higher progression of society the criminal act will increase in the society. The criminal act can happen in everywhere, whenever, and happen to everyone such as female and children, for example the case of rape to own blood children (incest). The research was conducted with the purpose to find out and analyze how was the process of the authentication of criminal act of rape to the own blood children (incest). Beside that it was intended to find out the strength of authentication of the witness explanation to the victim of children in the Decision of Public Court of Padang Number 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG. Based on result of research, that the Judge of Public Court of Padang who investigated, judged, and decided of case in Decision Number 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG, before took the decision of criminal punishment to the suspect of MY, he had conducted the series of authentication process in trial court. In the investigation process of authentication in court the Judges had conducted the requirement of Article 183 and 184 Legislation Number 8 in 1981 about the Legislation Book of Criminal Trial and implemented the theories about the transfer requirement and based in the juridical consideration. Based on the explanation above so the Judges stated that the suspect of MY was proven legally and conveniently conducted the criminal act of Doing Violence or Violence Threat to Force the Children Doing the Sexual Intercourse with Him based formulation Article 76D jo Article 81 (3) Legislation Number 35 in 2014 about the Legislation change Number 23 in 2002 about the Children Protection. Keywords: Authentication, Witness of Children Victim, Criminal Act of Rape |
| Kata kunci | Pembuktian, Saksi Korban Anak, Tindak Pidana Perkosaan. |
| Pembimbing 1 | Pranoto, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Handri Wirastuti S., S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | Prof. Dr. Hibnu Nugroho, S.H., M.H. |
| Tahun | 2016 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 14 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2016-02-17 17:33:51.600997 |