Update Artikelilmiah: 14139

MUHAMAD MUHYI ADAM

NIM

Judul Artikel

Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia)

ABSTRAK
Semakin berkembangnya suatu masyarakat maka berkembang pula tindak
pidana dalam suatu kelompok masyarakat tersebut. Tindak pidana dapat terjadi
dimanapun, kapanpun dan terhadap siapapun termasuk perempuan dan anak- anak,
misalnya saja kasus perkosaan terhadap anak kandung (incest). Penelitian ini
dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisa bagaimana proses
pembuktian tindak pidana perkosaan terhadap anak kandung (incest). Selain itu
ditujukan pula untuk mengetahui kekuatan pembuktian keterangan saksi korban
anak dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG.
Berdasarkan atas hasil penelitian, bahwa Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Padang
yang memeriksa, mengadili dan memutus perkara dalam Putusan Nomor
296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG, sebelum menjatuhkan putusan pidana terhadap
terdakwa MY, telah melaksanakan serangkaian proses pembuktian di persidangan.
Dalam proses pemeriksaan pembuktian di persidangan Majelis Hakim telah
melaksanakan ketentuan Pasal 183 dan Pasal 184 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun
1981 tentang Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan menerapkan teoriteori
tentang syarat pemidanaan serta didasarkan pada pertimbangan yuridis.
Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka Majelis Hakim menyatakan terdakwa MY terbukti
secara sah dan menyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana Melakukan Kekerasan Atau
Ancaman Kekerasan Memaksa Anak Melakukan Persetubuhan Dengannya
berdasarkan rumusan Pasal 76D jo Pasal 81 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 35
Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang
Perlindungan Anak.

Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris)

ABSTRACT
The higher progression of society the criminal act will increase in the
society. The criminal act can happen in everywhere, whenever, and happen to
everyone such as female and children, for example the case of rape to own blood
children (incest). The research was conducted with the purpose to find out and
analyze how was the process of the authentication of criminal act of rape to the
own blood children (incest). Beside that it was intended to find out the strength of
authentication of the witness explanation to the victim of children in the Decision
of Public Court of Padang Number 296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG.
Based on result of research, that the Judge of Public Court of Padang
who investigated, judged, and decided of case in Decision Number
296/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.PDG, before took the decision of criminal punishment to
the suspect of MY, he had conducted the series of authentication process in trial
court. In the investigation process of authentication in court the Judges had
conducted the requirement of Article 183 and 184 Legislation Number 8 in 1981
about the Legislation Book of Criminal Trial and implemented the theories about
the transfer requirement and based in the juridical consideration. Based on the
explanation above so the Judges stated that the suspect of MY was proven
legally and conveniently conducted the criminal act of Doing Violence or
Violence Threat to Force the Children Doing the Sexual Intercourse with Him
based formulation Article 76D jo Article 81 (3) Legislation Number 35 in 2014
about the Legislation change Number 23 in 2002 about the Children Protection.
Keywords: Authentication, Witness of Children Victim, Criminal Act of Rape

Kata kunci

Pembimbing 1

Pembimbing 2

Pembimbing 3

Tahun

Jumlah Halaman