Update Artikelilmiah: 7683

TEDY NURDIANTO

NIM

Judul Artikel

Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia)

Latar belakang: Early clinical exposure penting dalam pendidikan keperawatan, sayangnya perawat dan mahasiswa kurang memahami tugas dan kewajiban belajar. Hal ini berdampak pada pencapaian tugas. Sementara belum ada penelitian yang menggali tentang early clinical exposure.
Tujuan: Penelitian ini untuk mengidentifikasi perbedaan persepsi mahasiswa, clinical instructor (CI), dan perawat terhadap early clinical exposure.
Metode: Rancangan  cross sectional digunakan untuk mengukur 157 responden dengan menggunakan instrumen persepsi early clinical exposure.
Hasil: Mayoritas responden perempuan (64,3%), pengalaman early clinical exposure (96,2%) lebih dari dua kali. Secara keseluruhan persepsi ketiga kelompok responden tidak berbeda (p=0,523). Tidak ada perbedaan persepsi responden terhadap waktu pelaksanaan (p=0,367), pencapaian target (p=0,056), dan lingkungan belajar klinik (p=0,098), tetapi persepsi responden berbeda terhadap kesesuaian penugasan (p=0,012)
Kesimpulan: Early clinical exposure efektif karena persepsi mahasiswa, clinical instructor (CI), dan perawat tidak berbeda, demikian juga pada waktu pelaksanaan, pencapaian target, dan lingkungan belajar klinik. Tetapi berbeda dalam mempersepsikan kesesuaian penugasan.

Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris)

Background: Early clinical exposure is important in nursing education; however, nurses and students have not yet understood their responsibility and learning activities.Consequently, this has resulted in their achievement; and for now there is no research that has a deep analysis of early clinical exposure.
Objective: This research is aimed at identifying the difference between students, clinical instructor (CI), and nurses’ perceptions towards the early clinical exposure.
Method: A cross sectional design is used to measure the 157 respondents by the instrument of early clinical exposure perception.
Result:  Most female respondents (64.3%) experience the early clinical exposure (96.2%) more than twice. Overall, the perception of the three groups is similar (p=0.523). Moreover, there is no different perception towards the implementation period (p=0.367), the target (p=0.056), and the clinic learning environment (p=0.098); but there is respondents’ perception difference towards the assignment suitability (p=0.012).
Conclusion: The early clinical exposure is effective because there is no different perception between the students, the clinical instructor (CI), and the nurses. Similarly, there is no difference in the implementation period, target, and clinic learning environment; but there is a difference in perceiving the assignment suitability.

Kata kunci

Pembimbing 1

Pembimbing 2

Pembimbing 3

Tahun

Jumlah Halaman