Artikel Ilmiah : E1A008256 a.n. JOHAN ARI PURNOMO
| NIM | E1A008256 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | JOHAN ARI PURNOMO |
| Judul Artikel | KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR (Study Putusan No.21/Pid. Sus./2012/PN.PWT) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan hakim mendatangkan alat bukti surat visum et repertum dalam menjatuhkan Putusan Nomor 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT dan untuk mengetahui alat bukti surat visum et repertum mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian dalam Putusan Nomor 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan Yuridis Normatif yaitu dengan cara menelaah bahan pustaka (data sekunder) yang ada. Metode analisis yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif kualitatif yaitu dengan mengolah dan menafsirkan berdasarkan pada Putusan maupun Perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan Penelitian. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto. Dari penelitian yang dilakukan diperoleh hasil sebagai berikut : alasan hakim mendatangkan alat bukti surat visum et repertum dalam menjatuhkan Putusan Nomor 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT ialah merupakan tindak pidana penganiayaan, yaitu untuk mengetahui adanya unsur penganiayaan pada korban, unsur kesengajaan dan perkiraan waktu terjadinya tindak pidana penganiayaan yang tertuang dalam visum et repertum, visum et repertum itu sendiri berfungsi untuk menjernihkan duduk persoalan didalam pemeriksaan diPengadilan agar menjadi perkara tersebut menjadi terang dan jelas dan juga sebagai pengganti barang bukti (corpus delicti) menjelaskan sebagai pengganti peristiwa/keadaan yang terjadi dan pengganti barang bukti yang telah diperiksa dengan menurut fakta-fakta apa yang dilihat dan diketemukan pada waktu memeriksa mayat/tubuh manusia. Kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti visum et repertum pada Putusan Nomor: 21/ Pid.Sus/ 2012/ PN. PWT mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian bebas. Nilai pembuktian alat bukti surat sama halnya dengan nilai kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti keterangan saksi dan alat bukti keterangan ahli dan mempunyai kesamaan yaitu sama-sama mempunyai nilai kekuatan pembuktian yang bersifat bebas. Tetapi alat bukti ini harus tetap didukung oleh alat bukti lain dan tidak bisa berdiri sendiri. Visum et repertum dalam Putusan Nomor 21/ Pid.Sus/ 2012/ PN. PWT secara formil maupun materiil sudah terpenuhi, yaitu secara formil sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 187 huruf (c) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) dan secara materiil Visum Et Repertum membuktikan bahwa telah terjadi tindak pidana penganiayaan yang menyebabkan luka-luka pada tubuh korban dibagian kepala. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | This study aims to determine the reason for the judge to bring documentary evidence in dropping visum et repertum Decision Number 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT and to find documentary evidence visum et repertum have probative force in Decision No. 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT. This study uses normative juridical approach is to examine how library materials (secondary data) available. The method of analysis used in this study is that the qualitative normative process and interpret based on the verdict or legislation relating to research. The research was carried out at Navan District Court. From the obtained results of research conducted as follows: the reason the judge to bring documentary evidence in dropping visum et repertum Decision Number 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT is a criminal act of persecution, which is to determine the elements of torture on the victim, the element of intent and expected time of occurrence of maltreatment contained in visum et repertum, visum et repertum itself serves to clarify the issue sit in the examination of the case in court in order to be bright and clear, and also as a substitute for evidence (corpus delicti) describes as a replacement for the events / circumstances that occur and the surrogate evidence that has been examined in accordance with the facts of what is seen and is found when examining the body / human body. Probative force of evidence visum et repertum on Decision Number: 21 / Pid.Sus / 2012 / PN. PWT has independent probative force. Evidentiary value of documentary evidence as well as the value of the strength of evidence and witness testimony evidence evidence and expert testimony have in common is both have values that are independent probative force. But this evidence must still be supported by other evidence and can not stand alone. Visum et repertum in Decision No. 21 / Pid.Sus / 2012 / PN. PWT is formal and substantive are met, ie formally in accordance with the provisions of Article 187 point (c) Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) and materially Visum Et Repertum prove that maltreatment has occurred which caused the wounds on the body victim on his head. This study aims to determine the reason for the judge to bring documentary evidence in dropping visum et repertum Decision Number 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT and to find documentary evidence visum et repertum have probative force in Decision No. 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT. This study uses normative juridical approach is to examine how library materials (secondary data) available. The method of analysis used in this study is that the qualitative normative process and interpret based on the verdict or legislation relating to research. The research was carried out at Navan District Court. From the obtained results of research conducted as follows: the reason the judge to bring documentary evidence in dropping visum et repertum Decision Number 21/Pid.Sus/2012/PN. PWT is a criminal act of persecution, which is to determine the elements of torture on the victim, the element of intent and expected time of occurrence of maltreatment contained in visum et repertum, visum et repertum itself serves to clarify the issue sit in the examination of the case in court in order to be bright and clear, and also as a substitute for evidence (corpus delicti) describes as a replacement for the events / circumstances that occur and the surrogate evidence that has been examined in accordance with the facts of what is seen and is found when examining the body / human body. Probative force of evidence visum et repertum on Decision Number: 21 / Pid.Sus / 2012 / PN. PWT has independent probative force. Evidentiary value of documentary evidence as well as the value of the strength of evidence and witness testimony evidence evidence and expert testimony have in common is both have values that are independent probative force. But this evidence must still be supported by other evidence and can not stand alone. Visum et repertum in Decision No. 21 / Pid.Sus / 2012 / PN. PWT is formal and substantive are met, ie formally in accordance with the provisions of Article 187 point (c) Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) and materially Visum Et Repertum prove that maltreatment has occurred which caused the wounds on the body victim on his head. |
| Kata kunci | |
| Pembimbing 1 | PRANOTO, S.H.,M.H |
| Pembimbing 2 | Dr. HIBNU NUGROHO, S.H., M. H |
| Pembimbing 3 | Drs. ANTONIUS SIDIK MARYONO, S.H., M.S |
| Tahun | 2013 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 16 |
| Tgl. Entri | (belum diset) |