Artikel Ilmiah : E1A022229 a.n. DZAIKRA HAYKAL FIRJATULLAH
| NIM | E1A022229 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | DZAIKRA HAYKAL FIRJATULLAH |
| Judul Artikel | PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK MEREK TERKENAL “HANKE” BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS (Studi Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2025/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst ) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Penelitian dilatarbelakangi sengketa pendaftaran merek terkenal "HANKE" antara Junxiong Deng sebagai Penggugat melawan PT HANKE Trading Indonesia selaku Tergugat. Penggugat mengajukan gugatan pembatalan merek Tergugat pada kelas 18 karena dinilai memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya dan diajukan dengan iktikad tidak baik. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak merek terkenal serta menganalisis akibat hukum pembatalan merek berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis dalam Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2025/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Data bersumber dari studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk disajikan secara deskriptif analitis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, disimpulkan bahwa perlindungan preventif pendaftaran merek belum optimal sehingga Penggugat menempuh upaya perlindungan represif. Majelis Hakim menyatakan bahwa merek Tergugat terbukti memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya secara visual, fonetik, dan konseptual dengan merek terkenal "HANKE" milik Penggugat serta didaftarkan dengan iktikad tidak baik guna membonceng reputasi. Penggugat diakui secara yudisial sebagai pemegang merek terkenal. Merek milik Tergugat dibatalkan sehingga hak eksklusifnya hilang dan Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual diperintahkan mencoret merek tersebut dari Daftar Umum Merek. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | This study was prompted by a dispute over the registration of the well-known trademark “HANKE” between Junxiong Deng, as the Plaintiff, and PT HANKE Trading Indonesia, as the Defendant. The Plaintiff filed a petition to cancel the Defendant’s trademark in Class 18 on the grounds that it was substantially similar and had been filed in bad faith. The objective of this study is to examine the legal protection afforded to holders of well-known trademarks and to analyze the legal consequences of trademark cancellation under Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, as reflected in Judgment No. 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2025/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst. This study employs a normative legal method through legislative, conceptual, and case-based approaches. Data were sourced from a literature review and analyzed qualitatively to be presented in a descriptive-analytical manner. Based on the findings of the investigation and deliberations, it was concluded that preventive protection through trademark registration had not been optimal, leading the Plaintiff to pursue repressive protection measures. The Panel of Judges ruled that the Defendant’s trademark was proven to be substantially similar visually, phonetically, and conceptually to the Plaintiff’s well-known “HANKE” trademark and had been registered in bad faith to free-ride on its reputation. The Plaintiff was judicially recognized as the owner of the well-known trademark. The Defendant’s trademark was invalidated, thereby forfeiting its exclusive rights, and the Indonesian Directorate General of Intellectual Property was ordered to remove the trademark from the General Trademark Register. |
| Kata kunci | Iktikad Tidak Baik, Merek Terkenal, Perlindungan Hukum, Pembatalan Merek. |
| Pembimbing 1 | Maria Mu’ti Wulandari, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Ulil Afwa, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | Handityo Basworo, S.H., M.H. |
| Tahun | 2026 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 16 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2026-10-22 14:33:32.462878 |