Artikel Ilmiah : E1B022046 a.n. FAISHAL RIZQI MAHARDIKA
| NIM | E1B022046 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | FAISHAL RIZQI MAHARDIKA |
| Judul Artikel | IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRINCIPLE OF IN DUBIO PRO REO ON PROVING THE CRIME OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (Study of Hight Court Decision Number 96/Pid.Sus/2026/PT TJK) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Tindak pidana Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga selanjutnya dalam tulisan ini disebut KDRT dalam ruang privat kerap memiliki ketersediaan bukti objektif yang sangat terbatas, sehingga menyulitkan pembuktian dan selalu memicu keraguan majelis hakim yang memutus. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implikasi yuridis penerapan asas in dubio pro reo terhadap putusan perkara KDRT, serta mengetahui akibat hukum bagi terdakwa. Kondisi keraguan yuridis inilah yang bermuara pada penerapan asas in dubio pro reo demi menjamin perlindungan hak terdakwa di dalam sistem peradilan pidana kita. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan konseptual, di mana sumber data sekunder dianalisis kualitatif untuk memberikan gambaran deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan penerapan asas in dubio pro reo pada Putusan Nomor 96/Pid.Sus/2026/PT TJK tidak selalu harus berujung pada putusan pembebasan. Asas tersebut berfungsi mutlak sebagai batas yuridis pencegah pemidanaan tanpa bukti memadai, dan hakim menilai kesaksian serta visum telah memenuhi standar pembuktian negatif secara sah. Keyakinan hakim yang telah terbentuk utuh membuktikan kekerasan fisik tersebut sah, sehingga akibat hukum bagi terdakwa adalah penjatuhan pidana bersyarat selama sepuluh bulan penjara. Pidana bersyarat ini wajib dijalani bersama dengan masa pengawasan percobaan secara ketat selama rentang waktu satu tahun kalender penuh bagi terdakwa. Keputusan tersebut dipandang ideal karena sangat mencerminkan keseimbangan teori tujuan hukum yang meliputi perlindungan keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan di dalam sistem kehidupan masyarakat luas. Implementasi ini menyinergikan keadilan korban dengan perlindungan terdakwa agar terhindar dari peradilan sesat. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | The next crime of Domestic Violence in this article is called Domestic Violence in private spaces often has a very limited availability of objective evidence, making it difficult to prove and always triggering doubts for the panel of judges who decide. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the application of the principle of in dubio pro reo to domestic violence case decisions, as well as to find out the legal consequences for the defendant. This condition of juridical doubt leads to the application of the principle of in dubio pro reo in order to ensure the protection of the rights of the accused in our criminal justice system. This normative legal research uses the methods of legislative, case-based, and conceptual approaches, where secondary data sources are analyzed qualitatively to provide a descriptive picture. The results of the study show that the application of the principle of in dubio pro reo in Decision Number 96/Pid.Sus/2026/PT TJK does not always have to lead to an acquittal decision. This principle functions absolutely as a juridical limit to prevent criminal prosecution without sufficient evidence, and the judge considers that the testimony and visum have met the standard of negative proof legally. The judge's conviction that has been formed intact proves that the physical violence is legitimate, so that the legal consequence for the defendant is the imposition of a conditional sentence of ten months in prison. This conditional sentence must be served together with a period of strict probation supervision for a period of one full calendar year for the defendant. This decision is seen as ideal because it strongly reflects the theoretical balance of legal objectives which include the protection of justice, certainty, and utility in the life system of the wider community. This implementation synergizes victim justice with the protection of the defendant to avoid misguided trials. |
| Kata kunci | In dubio pro reo Principle ; Domestic Violence; Evidentiary Proof |
| Pembimbing 1 | Dessi Perdani Yuris Puspita Sari, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Salman Paris Harahap, S.H.I., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | |
| Tahun | 2026 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 21 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2026-08-24 14:47:15.569718 |