Artikel Ilmiah : E1A017295 a.n. LISA INDRIYANI
| NIM | E1A017295 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | LISA INDRIYANI |
| Judul Artikel | Cerai Gugat Karena Perjodohan (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jambi Nomor 360/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jmb). |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Tulisan hukum ini berjudul Cerai Gugat Karena Perjodohan (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jambi Nomor 360/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jmb). Kasus yang terjadi dalam perkara tersebut adalah perceraian karena perjodohan. Penggugat mengajukan gugatan perceraian karena sejak awal rumah tangga Penggugat Tergugat sudah tidak berjalan rukun dan harmonis, karena menikah berdasarkan perjodohan, namun di dalam pertimbangan hukumnya Hakim kurang mempertimbangkan adanya unsur perjodohan di dalam perkawinan a quo. Hakim juga kurang mempertimbangkan fakta bahwa suami telah melanggar taklik talak. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, yang menjadi rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengabulkan cerai gugat karena perjodohan (Tinjauan Yuridis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jambi Nomor 360/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jmb). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Yuridis Normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian Preskriptif. Penelitian dilakukan di Pusat Informsai Ilmiah Fakultas Hukum dan Unit Pelaksanaan Teknis Perpustakaan Universitas Jenderal Soedirman. Penelitian ini menggunakan data Sekunder, metode pengumpulan datanya adalah Studi Kepustakaan, dianalisis dengan metode Normatif Kualitatif, dan penyajian data dalam bentuk Teks Naratif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam memutus perceraian hanya berfokus pada perceraian dengan alasan perselisihan dan pertengkaran terus menerus berdasarkan Pasal 19 huruf (f) Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 tahun 1975 juncto Pasal 116 huruf (f) Kompilasi Hukum Islam tahun 1991. Menurut peneliti fakta-fakta di persidangan menunjukan bahwa Penggugat dan Tergugat menikah berdasarkan perjodohan, sehingga Pertimbangan hukum hakim dapat ditambah, yaitu karena perkara a quo sejak awal tidak memenuhi syarat materiil perkawinan Pasal 6 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 juncto Pasal 16 ayat (1) Kompilasi Hukum Islam yang menyatakan bahwa perkawinan yang akan dilakukan harus didasarkan persetujuan kedua calon mempelai. Menurut hasil penelitian pula, Tergugat telah melanggar taklik talak nomor 2 dan 4, yaitu tidak memberi nafkah wajib kepada istri tiga bulan lamanya, dan membiarkan (tidak memedulikan) istri selama enam bulan lamanya sehingga hakim dapat menambahkan juga Pasal 116 huruf g Kompilasi Hukum Islam dalam pertimbangan hukumnya. Kata Kunci : Cerai Gugat, Perjodohan |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | This legal paper is entitled Divorce Sues Due to Matchmaking (Juridical Review of the Jambi Religious Court Decision Number 360/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jmb). The case in this case is a divorce due to an arranged marriage. The Plaintiff filed a divorce suit because from the start the Plaintiff's Defendant's household had not run in harmony and harmony, because it was based on an arranged marriage, but in its legal considerations the judge did not consider the element of matchmaking in the a quo marriage. The judge also did not consider the fact that the husband had violated taklik talak. Based on this background, the formulation of the problem in this study is how the Judge's legal considerations in granting divorce due to matchmaking (Juridical Review of the Jambi Religious Court Decision Number 360/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jmb). The research method used is normative juridical with prescriptive research specifications. The research was conducted at the Center for Scientific Information Faculty of Law and the University of Jenderal Soedirman Library Technical Implementation Unit. This study uses secondary data, the data collection method is literature study, analyzed by qualitative normative methods, and data presentation is in the form of narrative text. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the basic legal considerations of judges in deciding divorce only focus on divorce on the grounds of continuous disputes and quarrels based on Article 19 letter (f) Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 in conjunction with Article 116 letter (f) Compilation of Islamic Law in 1991. According to the researcher, the facts at the trial showed that the Plaintiff and Defendant were married based on an arranged marriage, so that the judge's legal considerations could be added, namely because the a quo case from the start did not meet the material requirements of marriage Article 6 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 in conjunction with Article 16 paragraph (1) of the Compilation of Islamic Law which states that a marriage to be performed must be based on the approval of the two prospective brides. According to the results of the study, the Defendant had violated taklik talak numbers 2 and 4, namely not providing mandatory maintenance to his wife for three months, and leaving (ignoring) his wife for six months so that the judge can also add Article 116 letter g of the Compilation of Islamic Law in legal considerations. Keywords : Divorce Lawsuit, Matchmaking. |
| Kata kunci | Cerai Gugat, Perjodohan. |
| Pembimbing 1 | Dr. Siti Muflichah, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Haedah Faradz, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | Prof. Tri Lisiani Prihatinah, S.H., M.A., Ph.D. |
| Tahun | 2022 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 21 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2022-04-15 11:52:13.20245 |