Artikel Ilmiah : E1A017314 a.n. RAYHAN ZHAFRANDY KAMALRULLAH
| NIM | E1A017314 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | RAYHAN ZHAFRANDY KAMALRULLAH |
| Judul Artikel | GUGATAN ANGGOTA KOPERASI TERHADAP PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH KETUA KOPERASI SERBA USAHA MODERN KUDUS (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 250 K/PDT/2019) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Penelitian ini mengkaji mengenai bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengkualifisir unsur-unsur perbuatan melawan hukum, serta bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengkabulkan tuntutan ganti kerugian perbuatan melawan hukum pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 250 K/Pdt/2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan pendekatan konsep, spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis, sumber data sekunder dengan metode penyajian dalam bentuk sistematis, logis, dan rasional, metode analisis data yang digunakan normatif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa Majelis Hakim dalam pertimbangan hukumnya menyatakan para tergugat telah melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum tanpa mengkualifisir unsur-unsur mana yang dilanggar. Perbuatan Tergugat III telah melanggar hak subyektif berupa hak-hak atas harta kekayaan para penggugat (hak atas uang tabungan dan simpanan sukarela yang telah dibayarkan para penggugat). Perbuatan Tergugat III juga bertentangan dengan kewajiban hukumnya sendiri melanggar kewajiban hukum tertulis Pasal 3, Pasal 5 ayat (1) huurf c, Pasal 20 ayat (2) huruf f, Pasal 30 ayat (1) huruf d Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian. Majelis Hakim mengabulkan tuntutan ganti kerugian yang diajukan para penggugat, para Penggugat telah memenuhi syarat-syarat gugatan ganti kerugian Pasal 1365 KUH Perdata, pertimbangan hukum Majelis Hakim mengabulkan tuntutan ganti kerugian materiil para penggugat sebesar Rp.1.538.868.331,11 (satu milyar lima ratus lima puluh tiga juta enam ratus tujuh puluh delapan ribu enam ratus tujuh puluh tiga rupiah), bentuk ganti kerugian akibat dari perbuatan melawan hukum yang dibebankan kepada Tergugat III termasuk kedalam ganti rugi kompensasi/actual, merujuk pada ketentuan ganti rugi umum KUH Perdata pada Pasal 1243 para Penggugat telah sesuai mengajukan tuntutan ganti kerugian kepada Tergugat, dan menolak ganti rugi imateriil yang diajukan para Penggugat sebesar Rp.900.000.000 (Sembilan ratus juta rupiah) dengan pertimbangan bahwa gugatan ganti rugi imateriil tidak dapat dibuktikan. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | This study examines how the judge's legal considerations in qualifying the elements of an unlawful act, and how the judge's legal considerations in granting claims for compensation for an unlawful acts in the Supreme Court Decision Number 250 K/Pdt/2019. This study uses a normative juridical method with a law approach and a concept approach, descriptive-analytical research specifications, secondary data sources with a systematic, logical, and rational presentation method, qualitative normative data analysis methods used. The results showed that the Panel of Judges in their legal considerations stated that the defendants had committed acts against the law without qualifying which elements were violated. The actions of Defendant III have violated subjective rights in the form of rights to the assets of the plaintiffs (right to savings and voluntary savings that have been paid by the plaintiffs). Defendant III's actions also contradicted his legal obligations and violated the written legal obligations of Article 4, Article 29 paragraph (2) letter f, Article 29 paragraph (2) letter g, Article 94 paragraph (1) of Law Number 17 of 2012 concerning Cooperatives. The Panel of Judges granted the claim for compensation filed by the plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs had fulfilled the requirements of the claim for compensation in Article 1365 of the Civil Code, the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges granted the claim for material compensation of the plaintiffs in the amount of Rp. 538,868,331.11 (one billion five hundred fifty-three million six hundred seventy-eight thousand six hundred and seventy-three rupiahs), the form of compensation resulting from unlawful acts imposed on Defendant III is included in the compensation/actual compensation, referring to the general compensation provisions of the Civil Code in Article 1243 the Plaintiffs have complied with the claim for compensation to the Defendants, and rejecting the immaterial compensation submitted by the Plaintiffs in the amount of Rp.900,000,000 (Nine hundred million rupiah) on the consideration that the claim for immaterial compensation cannot be proven. |
| Kata kunci | ganti rugi, perbuatan melawan hukum, koperasi |
| Pembimbing 1 | Prof. Tri Lisiani Prihatinah, S.H., M.A., Ph.D. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Mukhsinun, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | Dr. Sulistyandari, S.H., M.Hum. |
| Tahun | 2021 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 25 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2021-11-09 21:12:42.821423 |