Artikel Ilmiah : E1A014056 a.n. EMERALD MAGMA AUDHA
| NIM | E1A014056 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | EMERALD MAGMA AUDHA |
| Judul Artikel | PURIFIKASI JUDICIAL REVIEW DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | ABSTRAK Berdasarkan Pasal 24 A ayat (1) juncto Pasal 24 C ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945, maka baik MA maupun MK sama-sama memiliki kewenangan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan atau judicial review. Pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah undang-undang terhadap undang-undang merupakan kewenangan MA, sedangkan pengujian undang-undang terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar adalah kewenangan MK. Dengan demikian, bisa dikatakan bahwa judicial review di Indonesia saat ini menganut sistem dua atap, yaitu di bawah atap MA dan atap MK. Meski begitu, terdapat beberapa permasalahan dalam judicial review bersistem dua atap, baik secara teoritik maupun praktik, yaitu seperti kontradiksi antara putusan MA dan MK, termasuk tumpang tindih atau konflik kewenangan, maupun ketidakefisienan dalam penyelenggaraan pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan yang bersistem dua atap. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian bertipe yuridis normatif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan merumuskan konsep purifikasi judicial review serta implikasi konsep purifikasi judicial review dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa dasar argumentasi (legal reasoning) perlunya purifikasi judicial review antara lain: inherensial dengan supremasi konstitusi yang dianut dalam UUD NRI 1945; koheren dengan penegakan paham pemisahan kekuasaan yang dianut dalam UUD NRI 1945; dan bentuk sinkronisasi terhadap sistem norma hukum Indonesia. Melalui rumusan konsep purifikasi judicial review yang dituangkan dalam usulan perubahan Pasal 24 A ayat (1) juncto Pasal 24 C ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945, maka pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan menjadi murni kewenangan MK dalam sistem satu atap. Sementara implikasi yuridisnya adalah peraturan perundang-undangan di bawah UUD NRI 1945 (in casu UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2003, UU Nomor 5 Tahun 2004, UU Nomor 3 Tahun 2009, UU Nomor 48 Tahun 2009, UU Nomor 8 Tahun 2011, UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2011, Peraturan MK Nomor 6 Tahun 2005 dan Peraturan MA Nomor 1 Tahun 2011) perlu disinkronisasi terhadap penerapan konsep purifikasi judicial review, baik melalui pembertidakberlakuan ataupun perubahan (revisi) terhadap ketentuan-ketentuan (in casu pasal-pasal) terkait. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | Based on Article 24 A paragraph (1) in juncto Article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, both the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court have the authority to review the laws or judicial review. Reviewing regulations under the law against the law is the authority of the Supreme Court, while reviewing the law against the Contitutions of 1945 is the authority of the Constitutional Court. Therefore, it can be said that judicial review in Indonesia currently adopts a two-roof system, namely under the roof of the Supreme Court and the roof of the Constitutional Court. Even so, there are several problems in judicial review with a two-roof system, both in theoretical and in practice, such as the contradiction between the Supreme Court's decision and the Constitutional Court's decision, including overlapping or conflicting authority, as well as inefficiencies in judicial review with a two-roof system. This research method is normative juridical. This research aims to analyze and formulate the judicial review purification concept and implications of the judicial review purification concept in Indonesian constitutional system. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the legal reasoning of the the judicial review purification urgency include: inherent with the supremacy of the constitution that is adhered to in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; coherent with the enforcement idea of separation of powers that is adhered to in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; and synchronization forms with the Indonesian legal norm system. Through the formulation of the judicial review purification concept as outlined in the proposed amendment to Article 24 A paragraph (1) juncto Article 24 C paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the reviewing of legislation purely becomes the authority of the Constitutional Court in the single-roof system. Meanwhile, the legal implications are legislation under the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (in casu Law Number 24 Year 2003, Law Number 5 Year 2004, Law Number 3 Year 2009, Law Number 48 Year 2009, Law Number 8 Year 2011, Law Number 12 Year 2011, Constitutional Court Regulation Number 6 Year 2005 and Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2011) need to be synchronized with the application of the concept of purification of judicial review, either through enactment or amendment (revision) of the related provisions (in casu articles). |
| Kata kunci | purifikasi, judicial review, sistem satu atap, pengujian peraturan perundang-undangan |
| Pembimbing 1 | Prof. Dr. H. Muhammad Fauzan, S.H., M.Hum. |
| Pembimbing 2 | Dr. Riris Ardhanariswari, S.H., M.H. |
| Pembimbing 3 | Tenang Haryanto, S.H., M.H. |
| Tahun | 2019 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 21 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2019-08-19 09:52:09.675859 |