Artikel Ilmiah : E1A113043 a.n. JUNO PRASABHA WIRAWA
| NIM | E1A113043 |
|---|---|
| Namamhs | JUNO PRASABHA WIRAWA |
| Judul Artikel | TINDAK PIDANA PENGHINAAN (Studi Putusan Nomor 131/PID.B/2015/PN.Tsm) |
| Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia) | Tindak pidana penghinaan atau pencemaran nama baik telah menjadi sorotan khusus di dunia Internasional. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan unsur-unsur tindak pidana penghinaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 310 Ayat (1) KUHP dalam perkara pidana Nomor: 131/Pid.B/2015/PN Tsm. dan mengetahui mengetahui dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana dalam perkara pidana Nomor: 131/Pid.B/2015/PN Tsm. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Bahan hukum yang diperoleh dianalisis secara kualitatif, yaitu analisis yang dilakukan dengan cara memahami dan merangkai bahan hukum yang telah dikumpulkan dan disusun secara sistematis dan diuraikan dengan secara bermutu dalam kalimat yang teratur, runtut, dan logis, kemudian ditarik kesimpulan. Kesimpulan hasil penelitian adalah penerapan unsur-unsur tindak pidana penghinaan di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto dalam putusan pidana Nomor 131/Pid.B/2015/PN Tsm telah sesuai dengan perbuatan yang diancam karena seluruh unsur-unsur tindak pidana penghinaan yang didakwakan kepada terdakwa oleh Jaksa Penuntut Umum telah dibuktikan kebenarannya di depan pengadilan. Dasar pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan pidana pada perkara pidana Nomor 131/Pid.B/2015/PN Tsm. adalah berdasarkan yuridis yaitu terpenuhinya unsur-unsur yang terkandung dalam Pasal 311 ayat (1) KUHP dan Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP, maka sudah cukup alasan untuk menyatakan perbuatan terdakwa tersebut telah terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melanggar pasal yang disangkakan yaitu unsur-unsur tindak pidana pada Pasal 310 ayat (1) KUHP. Selain itu, hakim juga mempertimbangkan hal-hal yang meringankan maupun memberatkan terdakwa yang termasuk dalam pertimbangan sosiologis. |
| Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris) | The offense of defamation or defamation has become a special highlight in the international world. The objective of this research is to know the application of elements of defamation crime as stipulated in Article 310 Paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code in the criminal case Number: 131 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN Tsm and know knowing the basis of judge's legal consideration in imposing criminal decision in criminal case Number: 131 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN Tsm. The research method used normative juridical approach. The legal material obtained is analyzed qualitatively, ie the analysis done by understanding and assembling the legal material which has been collected and arranged systematically and described in quality in a regular sentence, coherent and logical, then drawn conclusion. Conclusion of research result as follow the application of elements of defamation crime in the Purwokerto District Court in a criminal verdict Number 131 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN Tsm has been in accordance with the act that is threatened because all elements of defamation crime charged to the defendant by the Public Prosecutor have verified in court. The basis of the judge's judicial consideration in imposing criminal verdict on criminal cases Number 131 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN Tsm. is based on juridical, namely the fulfillment of the elements contained in Article 311 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code and Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, it is sufficient reason to declare the defendant's actions have been proven legally and convincingly violating the article that is suspected elements the offense in Article 310 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. In addition, the judge also considered things that lightened or incriminated the defendants who were included in sociological considerations. For the sake of the realization of legal certainty regulating the criminal act of defamation as stipulated in the Criminal Code, should be expected to all law enforcement officers, especially prosecutors and judges in handling cases such as defamatory offenses, prosecutors and judges should pay close attention to the elements in each article because if wrong in applying the article then it can be null and void. |
| Kata kunci | Penghinaan, Pidana |
| Pembimbing 1 | Dr. H. Kuat puji prayitno S.H., M.Hum |
| Pembimbing 2 | Sunaryo, S.H., M.Hum |
| Pembimbing 3 | |
| Tahun | 2017 |
| Jumlah Halaman | 11 |
| Tgl. Entri | 2017-11-17 13:33:49.078603 |