Update Artikelilmiah: 44536

LANANG AWATTARA MUHAMMAD

NIM

Judul Artikel

Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia)

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan adanya tindakan penguasaan tanah tanpa hak yang dilakukan oleh Sondang Pasaribu dan Mariana Sitompul selaku Para Terbanding semula Tergugat yang melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum berupa menguasai tanah milik Pembanding semula Penggugat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengkualifisir
kriterium perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Para Terbanding semula Tergugat dan menganalisis pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam mengkualifisir bentuk ganti kerugian yang harus dibayarkan kepada Pembanding semula Penggugat. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian preskriptif analitis. Data bersumber dari data sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan metode analisis normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, Majelis Hakim belum secara jelas mempertimbangkan kriterium perbuatan melawan hukum yang dilakukan oleh Para Terbanding semula Tergugat. Penulis berpendapat bahwaTerbanding semula Tergugat terbukti melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum dan memenuhi kriterium Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yaitu melanggar hak subyektif orang lain berupa hak milik atas tanah dan bertentangan dengan
 kewajiban hukumnya sendiri berlandaskan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960
 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria Pasal 20 dan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 1960 tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin Yang Berhak Atau Kuasanya Pasal 2. Dalam hasil penelitian ditemukan Majelis Hakim belum secara jelas mempertimbangkan apakah syarat-syarat mengajukan ganti kerugian bahwa syarat kumulatif dalam Pasal 1365 telah terpenuhi agar dapat mengajukan ganti kerugian ke hadapan
 pengadilan, dan Penulis berpendapat bahwa gugatan Pembanding semula
 Penggugat telah memenuhi syarat-syarat sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1365
 KUH Perdata yaitu adanya perbuatan melawan hukum, kerugian yang diderita
 secara kumulatif Rp. 10.600.000.000,00 (sepuluh milyar enam ratus juta rupiah),
 adanya kesalahan dari pihak Para Terbanding semula Tergugat, dan adanya
 hubungan kausal antara kerugian yang diderita dan tindakan Para Terbanding
 semula Tergugat.
 Perbuatan Melawan Hukum, Penguasaan Tanah Tanpa Hak, Ganti
 Rugi

Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris)

This research is motivated by the act of unlawful possession of land
 committed by Sondang Pasaribu and Mariana Sitompul as the original
 Defendants who uprooted, burned various perennials that had been planted by the
 original Plaintiff Appellant resulting in the losses suffered. This study aims to
 analyze the legal considerations of the judges in qualifying the criteria for
 tortious acts committed by the Defendants and to analyze the legal considerations
 of the judges in qualifying the form of compensation to be paid to the Plaintiff.
 This research uses a normative juridical approach with prescriptive analytical
 research specifications. Data is sourced from secondary data. The data collection
 method was carried out by literature study, using a qualitative normative analysis
 method.
 Based on the results of research and discussion, the Panel of Judges has
 not clearly considered the criteria for unlawful acts committed by the
 Respondents. The author is of the opinion that the Defendants were proven to
 have committed a tortious act and fulfilled the criteria of a tortious act, namely
 violating the subjective rights of others in the form of property rights to land and
 contrary to their own legal obligations based on Law Number 5 of 1960
 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles Article 20 and Government
 Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 51 of 1960 concerning Prohibition of Use of
 Land without the Permission of the Rightful Owner or his Proxy Article 2. In the
 research results it was found that the Panel of Judges had not clearly considered
 whether the requirements for applying for compensation that the cumulative
 requirements in Article 1365 had been fulfilled in order to apply for compensation
 before the court, and the author is of the opinion that the lawsuit of the Appellant,
 originally the Plaintiff, has fulfilled the requirements as stipulated in Article 1365
 of the Civil Code, namely the existence of unlawful acts, losses suffered
 cumulatively Rp. 10,600,000,000.00 (ten billion six hundred million rupiah), the
 existence of fault on the part of the Appellants, originally the Defendants, and the
 existence of a causal relationship between the losses suffered and the actions of
 the Appellants, originally the Defendants.
 Keywords: Unlawful Acts, Land Tenure Without Rights, Compensation

Kata kunci

Pembimbing 1

Pembimbing 2

Pembimbing 3

Tahun

Jumlah Halaman