Update Artikelilmiah: 44157

BULAN RAINA PUTRI PERMANA

NIM

Judul Artikel

Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia)

Masalah mengenai penerapan kekebalan organisasi internasional dari yurisdiksi negara pernah terjadi antara European Space Agency dengan dua stafnya, yaitu Waite dan Kennedy. Dalam kasus ini, European Space Agency mengandalkan kekebalannya dari yurisdiksi Jerman, sedangkan Waite dan Kennedy menggunakan hak individunya atas akses keadilan. Waite dan Kennedy mengajukan permohonan ke Komisi HAM Eropa yang kemudian diserahkan ke Mahkamah HAM Eropa terkait adanya pelanggaran Pasal 6 ayat (1) European Convention on Human Rights oleh European Space Agency.
Tujuan penelitian yaitu untuk menganalisis kekebalan organisasi internasional dalam kasus Waite dan Kennedy dengan European Space Agency. Tipe penelitian yaitu yuridis normatif dengan metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah statute approach dan case approach. Spesifikasi penelitian yaitu deskriptif analitis. Metode pengumpulan data yaitu studi kepustakaan dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang disajikan dalam bentuk uraian sistematis yang kemudian dianalisis secara normatif kualitatif.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, pengaturan terkait kekebalan organisasi internasional tercantum dalam Pasal 104 dan 105 Piagam PBB, Pasal 26 – 35 Konvensi Wina 1975, Bagian 2 dan Bagian 3 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations 1946, Pasal 3 Bagian 5 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of Specialized Agencies 1947, instrumen pendirian organisasi, dan headquarters agreement. Penerapan kekebalan organisasi internasional dalam kasus Waite dan Kennedy dengan European Space Agency menimbulkan pelanggaran hak individu atas akses keadilan, sebab berdasarkan uji hak-hak fundamental oleh Mahkamah HAM Eropa, Waite dan Kennedy tidak memiliki alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan nasional Jerman, sehingga kekebalan European Space Agency dapat dicabut.

Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris)

An issue regarding the application of an international organization's immunities from state jurisdiction has occurred between the European Space Agency and two of its staff, Waite and Kennedy. In this case, the European Space Agency relied on its immunity from German jurisdiction, while Waite and Kennedy invoked their individual rights to access justice. Waite and Kennedy filed an application to the European Commission on Human Rights which was then submitted to the European Court of Human Rights regarding the violation of Article 6 paragraph (1) of the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Space Agency.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the immunity of international organizations in the Waite and Kennedy v. the European Space Agency. The type of research is normative juridical with the approach method used is statute approach and case approach. The research specification is descriptive analytical. The data collection method is a literature study using secondary data presented in the form of a systematic description which is then analyzed normatively qualitatively.
Based on the results of the research, arrangements related to the immunity of international organizations are listed in Article 104 and 105 of the UN Charter, Articles 26 - 35 of the 1975 Vienna Convention, Section 2 and Section 3 of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations 1946, Article 3 Section 5 of the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of Specialized Agencies 1947, the organization's instrument of establishment, and the headquarters agreement. The application of international organization immunities in the Waite and Kennedy case with the European Space Agency led to a violation of the individual's right to access justice, according to the fundamental rights tested by the European Court of Human Rights, Waite and Kennedy had no alternative dispute resolution in the Germany national court, so the European Space Agency's immunities could be lifted.

Kata kunci

Pembimbing 1

Pembimbing 2

Pembimbing 3

Tahun

Jumlah Halaman