Home
Login.
Artikelilmiahs
32942
Update
INDRAJATI PARIPURNO
NIM
Judul Artikel
PENERAPAN UNSUR-UNSUR TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DALAM TEKNIK UNDERCOVER BUY (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jambi Nomor 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb)
Abstrak (Bhs. Indonesia)
Penelitian ini dilaksanakan untuk mengetahui penerapan unsur-unsur tindak pidana narkotika terhadap pelaku yang merupakan bagian dari teknik undercover buy, dan putusan bebas yang dijatuhkan oleh hakim dalam Perkara Pidana Nomor 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb. Metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi Penelitian deskriptif analisis, Sumber Data sekunder Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jambi Nomor 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb. Pengumpulan data dengan studi kepustakaan, disajikan dalam bentuk uraian, dianalisis dengan metode normatif kualitatif. Majelis Hakim dalam penerapan unsur-unsur tindak pidana narkotika terhadap pelaku yang merupakan bagian dari teknik undercover buy pada perkara pidana Nomor 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb, yaitu berdasarkan fakta hukum yang terungkap di persidangan, diketahui bahwa semua unsur-unsur dalam Pasal 114 Ayat (1), dan Pasal 112 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, tidak terpenuhi. Perbuatan terdakwa tidak terbukti memenuhi unsur-unsur pasal dimaksud, maka Terdakwa harus dinyatakan tidak terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana sebagaimana dakwaan Penuntut Umum dan membebaskan Terdakwa dari dakwaan tersebut. Putusan bebas yang dijatuhkan oleh Hakim dalam perkara tersebut di atas sudah tepat, yaitu setelah melalui proses persidangan sesuai dengan peraturan hukum yang berlaku dan telah didasarkan pada fakta hukum di persidangan, pertimbangan alat-alat bukti sebagaimana tercantum dalam Pasal 184 ayat (1), KUHAP berupa keterangan saksi-saksi dan keterangan terdakwa, Majelis Hakim memperoleh keyakinan bahwa terdakwa tidak bersalah melakukan tindak pidana. Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jambi menyatakan Terdakwa Muharam bin Marhumi, tidak terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan tindak pidana sebagaimana didakwakan dalam dakwaan Penuntut Umum; Membebaskan Terdakwa dari semua dakwaan Penuntut Umum; Memulihkan hak-hak Terdakwa dalam kemampuan, kedudukan, harkat serta martabatnya.
Abtrak (Bhs. Inggris)
This research was conducted to determine the application of the elements of narcotics crime against the perpetrators who were part of the undercover buy technique, and the acquittal handed down by the judge in the Criminal Case Number 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb. Normative juridical approach method. Specifications of descriptive analysis research, secondary data source Jambi District Court Decision Number 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb. Collecting data with literature study, presented in the form of a description, analyzed by qualitative normative methods. The Panel of Judges in the application of the elements of a narcotics crime against the perpetrator which is part of the undercover buy technique in the criminal case Number 395/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Jmb, namely based on the legal facts revealed at the trial, it is known that all the elements in Article 114 Paragraph (1), and Article 112 Paragraph (1) of Law no. 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, is not fulfilled. The defendant's actions are not proven to meet the elements of the article, then the Defendant must be declared not legally and convincingly proven to have committed a criminal act as charged by the Public Prosecutor and free the Defendant from the indictment. The acquittal verdict handed down by the judge in the case mentioned above was correct, namely after going through the trial process in accordance with applicable legal regulations and based on legal facts at trial, considering the evidence as stated in Article 184 paragraph (1), KUHAP In the form of testimony from witnesses and the defendant's statement, the Panel of Judges obtained the conviction that the defendant was not guilty of committing a crime. The Jambi District Court Panel of Judges stated that the Defendant, Muharam bin Marhumi, was not legally and convincingly proven to have committed a crime as charged in the indictment of the Public Prosecutor; Exonerated the Defendant from all charges of the Public Prosecutor; Restoring the rights of the Defendant in his ability, position, dignity and worth.
Kata kunci
Pembimbing 1
Pembimbing 2
Pembimbing 3
Tahun
Jumlah Halaman
Save